|
本文测试结果仅供参考, rhel 7.0的lvm cache也只是一个预览性质的特性, 从测试结果来看, 用在生产环境也尚早.
前段时间对比了Linux下ZFS和FreeBSD下ZFS的性能, 在fsync接口上存在较大的性能差异, 这个问题已经提交给zfsonlinux的开发组员.
http://blog.163.com/digoal@126/blog/static/1638770402014526992910/
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/2431
ZFS从功能和性能来讲, 确实是一个非常强大的文件系统, 包括块设备的管理.
Linux下如果要达到ZFS的部分功能, 需要软RAID管理, lvm, filesystem的软件组合.
RHEL 7开始, lvm针对SSD加入了类似flashcache, bcache的缓存功能. 支持writeback, writethrough模式.
本文将介绍一下lvm cache的使用, 同时对比一下它和zfs, flashcache, bcache以及直接使用ssd的性能差别.
理论上讲lvm cache 和bcache, flashcache的writeback模式, 相比直接使用ssd性能应该差不多(但是实际测试下来lvm的cache性能很不理想, 比zfs略好, 但是有大量的读, SSD iostat利用率很高, 并且lvm的条带使用不均匀, 不如zfs). ZFS使用ZIL后, 理论性能应该和前者也差不多, 但是zfsonlinux这块有我前面提到的性能问题, 所以就另当别论了.
另一方面, lvm cache的cache是独享的, 所以一个lv cache卷只能给一个lv orig卷使用. 这点和ZFS差别较大 . 但是zfs l2arc又不支持回写, 也是个缺陷.
本文测试环境 :
DELL R720xd
12 * 4TB SATA, 2*300G SAS(安装OS)
宝存 1.2T PCI-E SSD
CentOS 7 x64
测试fsync数据块大小8KB.
宝存SSD驱动安装.
[root@localhost soft_bak]# tar -zxvf release2.6.9.tar.gz
release2.6.9/
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.18-274.el5.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.32-279.1.1.el6.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/uninstall
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-v2.6-9.src.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.18-92.el5.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.32-131.0.15.el6.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.18-8.el5.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.18-238.el5.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/install
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.32-431.5.1.el6.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.18-128.el5.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.18-371.el5.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.18-308.el5.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.18-53.el5.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.18-194.el5.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.18-164.el5.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
release2.6.9/shannon-2.6.32-279.22.1.el6.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
[root@localhost soft_bak]# rpm -ivh release2.6.9/shannon-v2.6-9.src.rpm
Updating / installing...
1:shannon-2.6.18-v2.6-9 ################################# [100%]
warning: user spike does not exist - using root
warning: group spike does not exist - using root
warning: user spike does not exist - using root
warning: group spike does not exist - using root
warning: user spike does not exist - using root
warning: group spike does not exist - using root
# uname -r
3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64
# yum install -y kernel-devel-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 rpm-build gcc make ncurses-devel
# cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/
[root@localhost SPECS]# ll
total 8
-rw-rw-r--. 1 root root 7183 May 21 17:10 shannon-driver.spec
[root@localhost SPECS]# rpmbuild -bb shannon-driver.spec
[root@localhost SPECS]# cd ..
[root@localhost rpmbuild]# ll
total 0
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 32 Jul 9 19:56 BUILD
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Jul 9 19:56 BUILDROOT
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 19 Jul 9 19:56 RPMS
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 61 Jul 9 19:48 SOURCES
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 32 Jul 9 19:48 SPECS
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Jul 9 19:50 SRPMS
[root@localhost rpmbuild]# cd RPMS
[root@localhost RPMS]# ll
total 0
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 67 Jul 9 19:56 x86_64
[root@localhost RPMS]# cd x86_64/
[root@localhost x86_64]# ll
total 404
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 412100 Jul 9 19:56 shannon-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
[root@localhost x86_64]# rpm -ivh shannon-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.x86_64-v2.6-9.x86_64.rpm
Disk /dev/dfa: 1200.0 GB, 1200000860160 bytes, 2343751680 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 65536 bytes Disk label type: dos Disk identifier: 0x7e462b44
PostgreSQL安装
yum -y install lrzsz sysstat e4fsprogs ntp readline-devel zlib zlib-devel openssl openssl-devel pam-devel libxml2-devel libxslt-devel python-devel tcl-devel gcc make smartmontools flex bison perl perl-devel perl-ExtUtils* OpenIPMI-tools openldap-devel
wget http://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v9.3.4/postgresql-9.3.4.tar.bz2
tar -jxvf postgresql-9.3.4.tar.bz2
cd postgresql-9.3.4
./configure --prefix=/opt/pgsql9.3.4 --with-pgport=1921 --with-perl --with-tcl --with-python --with-openssl --with-pam --with-ldap --with-libxml --with-libxslt --enable-thread-safety --enable-debug --enable-cassert
gmake world && gmake install-world
ln -s /opt/pgsql9.3.4 /opt/pgsql
测试iops
1. 直接使用SSD
# mkfs.xfs -f /dev/dfa1
meta-data=/dev/dfa1 isize=256 agcount=32, agsize=6553592 blks
= sectsz=4096 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=209714944, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 ftype=0
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=102399, version=2
= sectsz=4096 sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
[root@localhost postgresql-9.3.4]# mount -t xfs /dev/dfa1 /mnt
[root@localhost postgresql-9.3.4]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/centos-root 50G 1.5G 49G 3% /
devtmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev
tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 16G 8.9M 16G 1% /run
tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sda3 497M 96M 401M 20% /boot
/dev/mapper/centos-home 173G 33M 173G 1% /home
/dev/dfa1 800G 34M 800G 1% /mnt
[root@localhost postgresql-9.3.4]# /opt/pgsql/bin/pg_test_fsync -f /mnt/1
5 seconds per test
O_DIRECT supported on this platform for open_datasync and open_sync.
Compare file sync methods using one 8kB write:
(in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
is Linux's default)
open_datasync 56805.093 ops/sec 18 usecs/op
fdatasync 45160.147 ops/sec 22 usecs/op
fsync 45507.091 ops/sec 22 usecs/op
fsync_writethrough n/a
open_sync 57602.016 ops/sec 17 usecs/op
Compare file sync methods using two 8kB writes:
(in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
is Linux's default)
open_datasync 28568.840 ops/sec 35 usecs/op
fdatasync 32591.457 ops/sec 31 usecs/op
fsync 32736.908 ops/sec 31 usecs/op
fsync_writethrough n/a
open_sync 29071.443 ops/sec 34 usecs/op
Compare open_sync with different write sizes:
(This is designed to compare the cost of writing 16kB
in different write open_sync sizes.)
1 * 16kB open_sync write 40968.787 ops/sec 24 usecs/op
2 * 8kB open_sync writes 28805.187 ops/sec 35 usecs/op
4 * 4kB open_sync writes 18107.673 ops/sec 55 usecs/op
8 * 2kB open_sync writes 834.181 ops/sec 1199 usecs/op
16 * 1kB open_sync writes 417.767 ops/sec 2394 usecs/op
Test if fsync on non-write file descriptor is honored:
(If the times are similar, fsync() can sync data written
on a different descriptor.)
write, fsync, close 35905.678 ops/sec 28 usecs/op
write, close, fsync 35702.972 ops/sec 28 usecs/op
Non-Sync'ed 8kB writes:
write 314143.606 ops/sec 3 usecs/op
iostat SSD使用率59%
[root@localhost postgresql-9.3.4]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/1 obs=4K oflag=sync,nonblock,noatime,nocache count=1024000
1024000+0 records in
128000+0 records out
524288000 bytes (524 MB) copied, 6.95128 s, 75.4 MB/s
iostat SSD使用率27.60
2. 使用lvm cache
# umount /mnt
清除设备信息(注意, 将丢失数据)
# dd if=/dev/urandom bs=512 count=64 of=/dev/dfa
# dd if=/dev/urandom bs=512 count=64 of=/dev/sdb
...
# dd if=/dev/urandom bs=512 count=64 of=/dev/sdm
创建pv
# pvcreate /dev/sdb
...
# pvcreate /dev/sdm
注意, 创建dfa的pv时报错, 跟踪后发现是需要修改lvm.conf
[root@localhost ~]# pvcreate /dev/dfa
Physical volume /dev/dfa not found
Device /dev/dfa not found (or ignored by filtering).
[root@localhost ~]# pvcreate -vvvv /dev/dfa 2>&1|less
#filters/filter-type.c:27 /dev/dfa: Skipping: Unrecognised LVM device type 252
[root@localhost ~]# ll /dev/dfa
brw-rw----. 1 root disk 252, 0 Jul 9 21:19 /dev/dfa
[root@localhost ~]# ll /dev/sdb
brw-rw----. 1 root disk 8, 16 Jul 9 21:03 /dev/sdb
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/devices
Character devices:
1 mem
4 /dev/vc/0
4 tty
4 ttyS
5 /dev/tty
5 /dev/console
5 /dev/ptmx
7 vcs
10 misc
13 input
21 sg
29 fb
128 ptm
136 pts
162 raw
180 usb
188 ttyUSB
189 usb_device
202 cpu/msr
203 cpu/cpuid
226 drm
245 shannon_ctrl_cdev
246 ipmidev
247 ptp
248 pps
249 megaraid_sas_ioctl
250 hidraw
251 usbmon
252 bsg
253 watchdog
254 rtc
Block devices:
259 blkext
8 sd
9 md
65 sd
66 sd
67 sd
68 sd
69 sd
70 sd
71 sd
128 sd
129 sd
130 sd
131 sd
132 sd
133 sd
134 sd
135 sd
252 shannon
253 device-mapper
254 mdp
修改/etc/lvm/lvm.conf, 添加宝存的type
[root@localhost ~]# vi /etc/lvm/lvm.conf
# types = [ "fd", 16 ]
types = [ "shannon", 252 ]
可以创建pv了.
[root@localhost ~]# pvcreate /dev/dfa
Physical volume "/dev/dfa" successfully created
创建新的vg
[root@localhost ~]# pvs
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/dfa lvm2 a-- 1.09t 1.09t
/dev/sda5 centos lvm2 a-- 238.38g 0
/dev/sdb lvm2 a-- 3.64t 3.64t
/dev/sdc lvm2 a-- 3.64t 3.64t
/dev/sdd lvm2 a-- 3.64t 3.64t
/dev/sde lvm2 a-- 3.64t 3.64t
/dev/sdf lvm2 a-- 3.64t 3.64t
/dev/sdg lvm2 a-- 3.64t 3.64t
/dev/sdh lvm2 a-- 3.64t 3.64t
/dev/sdi lvm2 a-- 3.64t 3.64t
/dev/sdj lvm2 a-- 3.64t 3.64t
/dev/sdk lvm2 a-- 3.64t 3.64t
/dev/sdl lvm2 a-- 3.64t 3.64t
/dev/sdm lvm2 a-- 3.64t 3.64t
创建机械盘和SSD盘2个VG
[root@localhost ~]# vgcreate vgdata01 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh /dev/sdi /dev/sdj /dev/sdk /dev/sdl /dev/sdm
Volume group "vgdata01" successfully created
[root@localhost ~]# vgcreate vgdata02 /dev/dfa
Volume group "vgdata02" successfully created
在机械盘的vg上创建lv
[root@localhost ~]# lvcreate -L 100G -i 12 -n lv01 vgdata01
Using default stripesize 64.00 KiB
Rounding size (25600 extents) up to stripe boundary size (25608 extents).
Logical volume "lv01" created
[root@localhost ~]# lvs
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert
home centos -wi-ao---- 172.69g
root centos -wi-ao---- 50.00g
swap centos -wi-ao---- 15.70g
lv01 vgdata01 -wi-a----- 100.03g
在SSD VG上创建cache data和cache meta lv.
[root@localhost ~]# lvcreate -L 100G -n lv_cdata vgdata02
Logical volume "lv_cdata" created
[root@localhost ~]# lvcreate -L 100M -n lv_cmeta vgdata02
Logical volume "lv_cmeta" created
将cache data和cache meta lv转换成cache pool
[root@localhost ~]# lvconvert --type cache-pool --poolmetadata vgdata02/lv_cmeta vgdata02/lv_cdata
Logical volume "lvol0" created
Converted vgdata02/lv_cdata to cache pool.
[root@localhost ~]# lvs
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert
home centos -wi-ao---- 172.69g
root centos -wi-ao---- 50.00g
swap centos -wi-ao---- 15.70g
lv01 vgdata01 -wi-a----- 100.03g
lv_cdata vgdata02 Cwi-a-C--- 100.00g
将机械盘LV转换成CACHE lv.
[root@localhost ~]# lvconvert --type cache --cachepool vgdata02/lv_cdata vgdata01/lv01
Unable to find cache pool LV, vgdata02/lv_cdata
报错, 目前不支持跨VG创建cache lv.
本地VG则支持.
[root@localhost ~]# lvcreate -L 100G -n lv01 vgdata02
Logical volume "lv01" created
[root@localhost ~]# lvconvert --type cache --cachepool vgdata02/lv_cdata vgdata02/lv01
vgdata02/lv01 is now cached.
所以需要调整一下, 把ssd加入vgdata01, 同时创建lvm条带时需要制定一下块设备.
[root@localhost ~]# lvremove /dev/mapper/vgdata02-lv01
Do you really want to remove active logical volume lv01? [y/n]: y
Logical volume "lv01" successfully removed
[root@localhost ~]# lvremove /dev/mapper/vgdata01-lv01
Do you really want to remove active logical volume lv01? [y/n]: y
Logical volume "lv01" successfully removed
[root@localhost ~]# lvchange -a y vgdata02/lv_cdata
[root@localhost ~]# lvremove /dev/mapper/vgdata02-lv_cdata
Do you really want to remove active logical volume lv_cdata? [y/n]: y
Logical volume "lv_cdata" successfully removed
[root@localhost ~]# vgremove vgdata02
Volume group "vgdata02" successfully removed
扩展vgdata01
[root@localhost ~]# vgextend vgdata01 /dev/dfa
Volume group "vgdata01" successfully extended
创建条带lvm, 同时指定机械盘(指定4K大小的条带).
[root@localhost ~]# lvcreate -L 100G -i 12 -I4 -n lv01 vgdata01 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh /dev/sdi /dev/sdj /dev/sdk /dev/sdl /dev/sdm
Rounding size (25600 extents) up to stripe boundary size (25608 extents).
Logical volume "lv01" created
创建cache lvm , 指定SSD.
[root@localhost ~]# lvcreate -L 100G -n lv_cdata vgdata01 /dev/dfa
Logical volume "lv_cdata" created
[root@localhost ~]# lvcreate -L 100M -n lv_cmeta vgdata01 /dev/dfa
Logical volume "lv_cmeta" created
转换cache lv
[root@localhost ~]# lvconvert --type cache-pool --poolmetadata vgdata01/lv_cmeta --cachemode writeback vgdata01/lv_cdata
Logical volume "lvol0" created
Converted vgdata01/lv_cdata to cache pool.
[root@localhost ~]# lvconvert --type cache --cachepool vgdata01/lv_cdata vgdata01/lv01
vgdata01/lv01 is now cached.
[root@localhost ~]# lvs
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert
home centos -wi-ao---- 172.69g
root centos -wi-ao---- 50.00g
swap centos -wi-ao---- 15.70g
lv01 vgdata01 Cwi-a-C--- 100.03g lv_cdata [lv01_corig]
lv_cdata vgdata01 Cwi-a-C--- 100.00g
在合并后的lv01上创建文件系统.
[root@localhost ~]# mkfs.xfs /dev/mapper/vgdata01-lv01
meta-data=/dev/mapper/vgdata01-lv01 isize=256 agcount=16, agsize=1638912 blks
= sectsz=4096 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=26222592, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 ftype=0
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=12804, version=2
= sectsz=4096 sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
[root@localhost ~]# mount /dev/mapper/vgdata01-lv01 /mnt
[root@localhost ~]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vgdata01-lv01 100G 33M 100G 1% /mnt
[root@localhost ~]# /opt/pgsql/bin/pg_test_fsync -f /mnt/1
5 seconds per test
O_DIRECT supported on this platform for open_datasync and open_sync.
Compare file sync methods using one 8kB write:
(in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
is Linux's default)
open_datasync 8124.408 ops/sec 123 usecs/op
fdatasync 8178.149 ops/sec 122 usecs/op
fsync 8113.938 ops/sec 123 usecs/op
fsync_writethrough n/a
open_sync 8300.755 ops/sec 120 usecs/op
Compare file sync methods using two 8kB writes:
(in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
is Linux's default)
open_datasync 4178.896 ops/sec 239 usecs/op
fdatasync 6963.270 ops/sec 144 usecs/op
fsync 6930.345 ops/sec 144 usecs/op
fsync_writethrough n/a
open_sync 4205.576 ops/sec 238 usecs/op
Compare open_sync with different write sizes:
(This is designed to compare the cost of writing 16kB
in different write open_sync sizes.)
1 * 16kB open_sync write 7062.249 ops/sec 142 usecs/op
2 * 8kB open_sync writes 4229.181 ops/sec 236 usecs/op
4 * 4kB open_sync writes 2281.264 ops/sec 438 usecs/op
8 * 2kB open_sync writes 583.685 ops/sec 1713 usecs/op
16 * 1kB open_sync writes 285.534 ops/sec 3502 usecs/op
Test if fsync on non-write file descriptor is honored:
(If the times are similar, fsync() can sync data written
on a different descriptor.)
write, fsync, close 7494.674 ops/sec 133 usecs/op
write, close, fsync 7481.698 ops/sec 134 usecs/op
Non-Sync'ed 8kB writes:
write 307025.095 ops/sec 3 usecs/op
iostat SSD 使用率55%
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util
dfa 0.00 0.00 878.00 15828.00 56192.00 63312.00 14.31 0.63 0.04 0.51 0.01 0.03 52.80
sdc 0.00 288.00 0.00 8350.00 0.00 4664.00 1.12 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 14.00
sdb 0.00 288.00 0.00 8350.00 0.00 4664.00 1.12 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 11.90
sdd 0.00 288.00 0.00 8350.00 0.00 4664.00 1.12 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 11.90
sdh 0.00 299.00 0.00 8350.00 0.00 4708.00 1.13 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 14.10
sdf 0.00 299.00 0.00 8350.00 0.00 4708.00 1.13 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 11.40
sdi 0.00 299.00 0.00 8350.00 0.00 4708.00 1.13 0.15 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 14.30
sdg 0.00 299.00 0.00 8350.00 0.00 4708.00 1.13 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 13.30
sde 0.00 288.00 0.00 8350.00 0.00 4664.00 1.12 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 12.00
sdl 0.00 291.00 0.00 8350.00 0.00 4676.00 1.12 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 14.00
sdk 0.00 291.00 0.00 8352.00 0.00 4676.00 1.12 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 13.60
sdm 0.00 291.00 0.00 8352.00 0.00 4676.00 1.12 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 13.60
sdj 0.00 291.00 0.00 8352.00 0.00 4676.00 1.12 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 14.10
[root@localhost ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/1 obs=4K oflag=sync,nonblock,noatime,nocache count=1024000
1024000+0 records in
128000+0 records out
524288000 bytes (524 MB) copied, 90.1487 s, 5.8 MB/s
直接使用机械盘条带的测试结果 (指定4KiB条带大小)
[root@localhost ~]# lvcreate -L 100G -i 12 -I4 -n lv02 vgdata01 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh /dev/sdi /dev/sdj /dev/sdk /dev/sdl /dev/sdm
[root@localhost ~]# mkfs.xfs /dev/mapper/vgdata01-lv02
meta-data=/dev/mapper/vgdata01-lv02 isize=256 agcount=16, agsize=1638911 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=26222576, imaxpct=25
= sunit=1 swidth=12 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 ftype=0
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=12803, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
# mount /dev/mapper/vgdata01-lv02 /mnt
[root@localhost ~]# /opt/pgsql/bin/pg_test_fsync -f /mnt/1
5 seconds per test
O_DIRECT supported on this platform for open_datasync and open_sync.
Compare file sync methods using one 8kB write:
(in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
is Linux's default)
open_datasync 5724.374 ops/sec 175 usecs/op
fdatasync 5143.975 ops/sec 194 usecs/op
fsync 5248.552 ops/sec 191 usecs/op
fsync_writethrough n/a
open_sync 5636.435 ops/sec 177 usecs/op
Compare file sync methods using two 8kB writes:
(in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
is Linux's default)
open_datasync 2763.554 ops/sec 362 usecs/op
fdatasync 4121.941 ops/sec 243 usecs/op
fsync 4060.660 ops/sec 246 usecs/op
fsync_writethrough n/a
open_sync 2701.105 ops/sec 370 usecs/op
Compare open_sync with different write sizes:
(This is designed to compare the cost of writing 16kB
in different write open_sync sizes.)
1 * 16kB open_sync write 5019.091 ops/sec 199 usecs/op
2 * 8kB open_sync writes 3055.081 ops/sec 327 usecs/op
4 * 4kB open_sync writes 1715.343 ops/sec 583 usecs/op
8 * 2kB open_sync writes 786.708 ops/sec 1271 usecs/op
16 * 1kB open_sync writes 469.455 ops/sec 2130 usecs/op
Test if fsync on non-write file descriptor is honored:
(If the times are similar, fsync() can sync data written
on a different descriptor.)
write, fsync, close 4490.716 ops/sec 223 usecs/op
write, close, fsync 4566.385 ops/sec 219 usecs/op
Non-Sync'ed 8kB writes:
write 294268.753 ops/sec 3 usecs/op
条带利用率显然没有ZFS使用均匀.
sdc 0.00 0.00 0.00 14413.00 0.00 28988.00 4.02 0.40 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 39.90
sdb 0.00 0.00 0.00 14413.00 0.00 28988.00 4.02 0.39 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 38.90
sdd 0.00 0.00 0.00 7248.00 0.00 328.00 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90
sdh 0.00 0.00 0.00 7248.00 0.00 328.00 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90
sdf 0.00 0.00 0.00 7248.00 0.00 328.00 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40
sdi 0.00 0.00 0.00 7248.00 0.00 328.00 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70
sdg 0.00 0.00 0.00 7248.00 0.00 328.00 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.90
sde 0.00 0.00 0.00 7248.00 0.00 328.00 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90
sdl 0.00 0.00 0.00 7248.00 0.00 328.00 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00
sdk 0.00 0.00 0.00 7248.00 0.00 328.00 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40
sdm 0.00 0.00 0.00 7248.00 0.00 328.00 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.70
sdj 0.00 0.00 0.00 7248.00 0.00 328.00 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
删除设备
# umount /mnt
[root@localhost ~]# lvremove vgdata01/lv_cdata
Flushing cache for lv01
970 blocks must still be flushed.
0 blocks must still be flushed.
Do you really want to remove active logical volume lv_cdata? [y/n]: y
Logical volume "lv_cdata" successfully removed
[root@localhost ~]# lvremove vgdata01/lv01
Do you really want to remove active logical volume lv01? [y/n]: y
Logical volume "lv01" successfully removed
[root@localhost ~]# lvremove vgdata01/lv02
Do you really want to remove active logical volume lv02? [y/n]: y
Logical volume "lv02" successfully removed
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/dfa
PV /dev/dfa belongs to Volume Group vgdata01 so please use vgreduce first.
(If you are certain you need pvremove, then confirm by using --force twice.)
[root@localhost ~]# vgremove vgdata01
Volume group "vgdata01" successfully removed
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/dfa
Labels on physical volume "/dev/dfa" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/sdb
Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdb" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/sdc
Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdc" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/sdd
Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdd" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/sde
Labels on physical volume "/dev/sde" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/sdf
Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdf" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/sdg
Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdg" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/sdh
Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdh" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/sdi
Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdi" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/sdj
Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdj" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/sdk
Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdk" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/sdl
Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdl" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvremove /dev/sdm
Labels on physical volume "/dev/sdm" successfully wiped
[root@localhost ~]# pvs
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/sda5 centos lvm2 a-- 238.38g 0
以下测试可参照, 其中flashcache性能损失极少(甚至比直接使用SSD性能更高).
zfs和lvm性能差不多, lvm略高, 但是LVM的fsync带来了大量的cache设备的读操作, 使得ssd的util比zfs高很多, 相当于浪费了较多的io. 不知原因, ZFSonLinux 则没有这个问题.
http://blog.163.com/digoal@126/blog/static/1638770402014528115551323/
3. 使用flashcache
4. 使用bcache
5. 使用zfs
# yum install -y libtoolize autoconf automake
# tar -zxvf spl-0.6.3.tar.gz
# tar -zxvf zfs-0.6.3.tar.gz
# cd spl-0.6.3
# ./autogen.sh
# ./configure --prefix=/opt/spl0.6.3
# make && make install
[root@localhost spl-0.6.3]# cd ..
[root@localhost soft_bak]# cd zfs-0.6.3
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# yum install -y libuuid-devel
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# ./configure --prefix=/opt/zfs0.6.3
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# make && make install
[root@localhost ~]# modprobe splat
[root@localhost ~]# /opt/spl0.6.3/sbin/splat -a
------------------------------ Running SPLAT Tests ------------------------------
kmem:kmem_alloc Pass
kmem:kmem_zalloc Pass
kmem:vmem_alloc Pass
kmem:vmem_zalloc Pass
kmem:slab_small Pass
kmem:slab_large Pass
kmem:slab_align Pass
kmem:slab_reap Pass
kmem:slab_age Pass
kmem:slab_lock Pass
kmem:vmem_size Pass
kmem:slab_reclaim Pass
taskq:single Pass
taskq:multiple Pass
taskq:system Pass
taskq:wait Pass
taskq:order Pass
taskq:front Pass
taskq:recurse Pass
taskq:contention Pass
taskq:delay Pass
taskq:cancel Pass
krng:freq Pass
mutex:tryenter Pass
mutex:race Pass
mutex:owned Pass
mutex:owner Pass
condvar:signal1 Pass
condvar:broadcast1 Pass
condvar:signal2 Pass
condvar:broadcast2 Pass
condvar:timeout Pass
thread:create Pass
thread:exit Pass
thread:tsd Pass
rwlock:N-rd/1-wr Pass
rwlock:0-rd/N-wr Pass
rwlock:held Pass
rwlock:tryenter Pass
rwlock:rw_downgrade Pass
rwlock:rw_tryupgrade Pass
time:time1 Pass
time:time2 Pass
vnode:vn_open Pass
vnode:vn_openat Pass
vnode:vn_rdwr Pass
vnode:vn_rename Pass
vnode:vn_getattr Pass
vnode:vn_sync Pass
kobj:open Pass
kobj:size/read Pass
atomic:64-bit Pass
list:create/destroy Pass
list:ins/rm head Pass
list:ins/rm tail Pass
list:insert_after Pass
list:insert_before Pass
list:remove Pass
list:active Pass
generic:ddi_strtoul Pass
generic:ddi_strtol Pass
generic:ddi_strtoull Pass
generic:ddi_strtoll Pass
generic:udivdi3 Pass
generic:divdi3 Pass
cred:cred Pass
cred:kcred Pass
cred:groupmember Pass
zlib:compress/uncompress Pass
linux:shrink_dcache Pass
linux:shrink_icache Pass
linux:shrinker Pass
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# /opt/zfs0.6.3/sbin/zpool create -f -o ashift=12 zp1 sdb sdc sdd sde sdf sdg sdh sdi sdj sdk sdl sdm
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# export PATH=/opt/zfs0.6.3/sbin:$PATH
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# zpool status
pool: zp1
state: ONLINE
scan: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
zp1 ONLINE 0 0 0
sdb ONLINE 0 0 0
sdc ONLINE 0 0 0
sdd ONLINE 0 0 0
sde ONLINE 0 0 0
sdf ONLINE 0 0 0
sdg ONLINE 0 0 0
sdh ONLINE 0 0 0
sdi ONLINE 0 0 0
sdj ONLINE 0 0 0
sdk ONLINE 0 0 0
sdl ONLINE 0 0 0
sdm ONLINE 0 0 0
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# fdisk -c -u /dev/dfa
Welcome to fdisk (util-linux 2.23.2).
Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them.
Be careful before using the write command.
Device does not contain a recognized partition table
Building a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x2dd27e66.
The device presents a logical sector size that is smaller than
the physical sector size. Aligning to a physical sector (or optimal
I/O) size boundary is recommended, or performance may be impacted.
Command (m for help): n
Partition type:
p primary (0 primary, 0 extended, 4 free)
e extended
Select (default p): p
Partition number (1-4, default 1):
First sector (2048-2343751679, default 2048):
Using default value 2048
Last sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (2048-2343751679, default 2343751679): +16777216
Partition 1 of type Linux and of size 8 GiB is set
Command (m for help): n
Partition type:
p primary (1 primary, 0 extended, 3 free)
e extended
Select (default p): p
Partition number (2-4, default 2):
First sector (16779265-2343751679, default 16781312):
Using default value 16781312
Last sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (16781312-2343751679, default 2343751679): +209715200
Partition 2 of type Linux and of size 100 GiB is set
Command (m for help): w
The partition table has been altered!
Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table.
Syncing disks.
添加zil
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# zpool add zp1 log /dev/dfa1
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# zpool status
pool: zp1
state: ONLINE
scan: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
zp1 ONLINE 0 0 0
sdb ONLINE 0 0 0
sdc ONLINE 0 0 0
sdd ONLINE 0 0 0
sde ONLINE 0 0 0
sdf ONLINE 0 0 0
sdg ONLINE 0 0 0
sdh ONLINE 0 0 0
sdi ONLINE 0 0 0
sdj ONLINE 0 0 0
sdk ONLINE 0 0 0
sdl ONLINE 0 0 0
sdm ONLINE 0 0 0
logs
dfa1 ONLINE 0 0 0
新增zfs
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# zfs create -o atime=off -o mountpoint=/data01 zp1/data01
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/centos-root 50G 1.7G 49G 4% /
devtmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev
tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 16G 8.9M 16G 1% /run
tmpfs 16G 0 16G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mapper/centos-home 173G 33M 173G 1% /home
/dev/sda3 497M 96M 401M 20% /boot
zp1 43T 128K 43T 1% /zp1
zp1/data01 43T 128K 43T 1% /data01
测试
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# /opt/pgsql/bin/pg_test_fsync -f /data01/1
5 seconds per test
O_DIRECT supported on this platform for open_datasync and open_sync.
Compare file sync methods using one 8kB write:
(in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
is Linux's default)
open_datasync n/a*
fdatasync 6107.726 ops/sec 164 usecs/op
fsync 7016.477 ops/sec 143 usecs/op
fsync_writethrough n/a
open_sync n/a*
* This file system and its mount options do not support direct
I/O, e.g. ext4 in journaled mode.
Compare file sync methods using two 8kB writes:
(in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
is Linux's default)
open_datasync n/a*
fdatasync 5602.343 ops/sec 178 usecs/op
fsync 8100.693 ops/sec 123 usecs/op
fsync_writethrough n/a
open_sync n/a*
* This file system and its mount options do not support direct
I/O, e.g. ext4 in journaled mode.
Compare open_sync with different write sizes:
(This is designed to compare the cost of writing 16kB
in different write open_sync sizes.)
1 * 16kB open_sync write n/a*
2 * 8kB open_sync writes n/a*
4 * 4kB open_sync writes n/a*
8 * 2kB open_sync writes n/a*
16 * 1kB open_sync writes n/a*
Test if fsync on non-write file descriptor is honored:
(If the times are similar, fsync() can sync data written
on a different descriptor.)
write, fsync, close 6521.974 ops/sec 153 usecs/op
write, close, fsync 6672.833 ops/sec 150 usecs/op
Non-Sync'ed 8kB writes:
write 82646.970 ops/sec 12 usecs/op
[root@localhost zfs-0.6.3]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/data01/1 obs=4K oflag=sync,nonblock,noatime,nocache count=1024000
1024000+0 records in
128000+0 records out
524288000 bytes (524 MB) copied, 12.9542 s, 40.5 MB/s
zfs直接使用机械盘测试, IOPS分布非常均匀.
[root@localhost ~]# zpool remove zp1 /dev/dfa1
[root@localhost ~]# /opt/pgsql/bin/pg_test_fsync -f /data01/1
5 seconds per test
O_DIRECT supported on this platform for open_datasync and open_sync.
Compare file sync methods using one 8kB write:
(in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync
is Linux's default)
open_datasync n/a*
fdatasync 8086.756 ops/sec 124 usecs/op
fsync 7312.509 ops/sec 137 usecs/op
sdc 0.00 0.00 0.00 1094.00 0.00 10940.00 20.00 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 3.50
sdb 0.00 0.00 0.00 1094.00 0.00 10940.00 20.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 3.10
sdd 0.00 0.00 0.00 1094.00 0.00 10940.00 20.00 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 3.50
sdh 0.00 0.00 0.00 1092.00 0.00 10920.00 20.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.04 4.20
sdf 0.00 0.00 0.00 1094.00 0.00 10940.00 20.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.03 3.70
sdi 0.00 0.00 0.00 1092.00 0.00 10920.00 20.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 3.10
sdg 0.00 0.00 0.00 1094.00 0.00 10940.00 20.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 2.90
sde 0.00 0.00 0.00 1094.00 0.00 10940.00 20.00 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 3.60
sdl 0.00 0.00 0.00 1092.00 0.00 10920.00 20.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 2.10
sdk 0.00 0.00 0.00 1094.00 0.00 10940.00 20.00 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 3.70
sdm 0.00 0.00 0.00 1092.00 0.00 10920.00 20.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 3.00
sdj 0.00 0.00 0.00 1094.00 0.00 10940.00 20.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.04 3.90
1. http://blog.163.com/digoal@126/blog/static/1638770402014699041427/
2. http://blog.163.com/digoal@126/blog/static/163877040201463101652528/
3. http://blog.163.com/digoal@126/blog/static/1638770402014528115551323/
4. http://blog.163.com/digoal@126/blog/static/16387704020145264116819/
5. http://blog.163.com/digoal@126/blog/static/1638770402014526992910/
6. http://blog.163.com/digoal@126/blog/static/16387704020145198321025/
7. https://github.com/facebook/flashcache
8. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/Logical_Volume_Manager_Administration/LV.html#LV_stripecreate
(责任编辑：IT) |