Sysbench测试:
测试环境: 工具:sysbench 0.4.12 Mysql 5.6.15 Innodb buffer pool:2G 本次测试,数据量:11.7G 注:以下所提及到的本地硬盘,为raid存储划分到本地的空间。 准备数据: sysbench --debug=off --test=oltp --mysql-table-engine=innodb --oltp-table-size=50000000 --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=mysql --mysql-socket=/lsi/mysql/mysql.sock prepare 说明:模拟OLTP操作,数据量5000万行,每行记录252Byte。 LSI: sysbench --num-threads=256 --test=oltp --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=mysql --mysql-table-engine=innodb --init-rng=on --oltp-table-size=50000000 --max-time=$RT --max-requests=1000000 --mysql-socket=/lsi/mysql/mysql.sock run > sysbench.log 说明:并发256,存储引擎innodb 执行过程中,CPU与LSI卡的情况: 说明:并发较大,CPU较繁忙,但是IO不是太busy,说明瓶颈不在IO上。 最终结果: Initializing random number generator from timer. Doing OLTP test. Running mixed OLTP test Using Special distribution (12 iterations, 1 pct of values are returned in 75 pct cases) Using "BEGIN" for starting transactions Using auto_inc on the id column Maximum number of requests for OLTP test is limited to 1000000 Threads started! Done. OLTP test statistics: queries performed: read: 14014098 write: 5005024 other: 2002010 total: 21021132 transactions: 1001003 (3445.66 per sec.) deadlocks: 4 (0.01 per sec.) read/write requests: 19019122 (65467.84 per sec.) other operations: 2002010 (6891.34 per sec.) Test execution summary: total time: 290.5109s total number of events: 1001003 total time taken by event execution: 74348.2259 per-request statistics: min: 3.41ms avg: 74.27ms max: 756.14ms approx. 95 percentile: 144.95ms Threads fairness: events (avg/stddev): 3910.1680/32.56 execution time (avg/stddev): 290.4228/0.01 本地盘: sysbench --num-threads=256 --test=oltp --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=mysql --mysql-table-engine=innodb --init-rng=on --oltp-table-size=50000000 --max-time=$RT --max-requests=1000000 --mysql-socket=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock run > sysbench.log 执行过程中磁盘与CPU情况: 说明:与LSI存储卡相比,本地磁盘进行OLTP模拟测试时,CPU相对空闲,IO成为瓶颈。 最终结果: Initializing random number generator from timer. Doing OLTP test. Running mixed OLTP test Using Special distribution (12 iterations, 1 pct of values are returned in 75 pct cases) Using "BEGIN" for starting transactions Using auto_inc on the id column Maximum number of requests for OLTP test is limited to 1000000 Threads started! Done. OLTP test statistics: queries performed: read: 14013118 write: 5004682 other: 2001873 total: 21019673 transactions: 1000936 (959.86 per sec.) deadlocks: 1 (0.00 per sec.) read/write requests: 19017800 (18237.34 per sec.) other operations: 2001873 (1919.72 per sec.) Test execution summary: total time: 1042.7948s total number of events: 1000936 total time taken by event execution: 266923.0217 per-request statistics: min: 3.46ms avg: 266.67ms max: 6884.36ms approx. 95 percentile: 649.23ms Threads fairness: events (avg/stddev): 3909.9062/30.04 execution time (avg/stddev): 1042.6681/0.03 结论:使用LSI闪存卡后,MySQL的TPS提升了260%。其实本测试中的磁盘也是相当高端的存储,一般磁盘达不到这个数(具体配置我记不清了,可通过下面的IOPS可以看出来) FIO测试: 进行8K的随机读,测试时间为10分钟 LSI: fio tmp.txt tmp.txt [global] direct=1 iodepth=32 ioengine=libaio norandommap randrepeat=0 numjobs=128 runtime=600 ramp_time=60 thread group_reporting name=mytest [randread] filename=/dev/sda1 bs=8k rw=randread 说明:FIO测试是直接对存储设备进行读写 最终结果: [1123MB/0KB/0KB /s] [144K/0/0 iops] [eta 00m:00s] mytest: (groupid=0, jobs=128): err= 0: pid=9514: Fri Jan 17 15:30:26 2014 read : io=671818MB, bw=1119.7MB/s, iops=143310, runt=600015msec slat (usec): min=3, max=136762, avg=871.03, stdev=4018.21 clat (usec): min=77, max=237967, avg=27708.34, stdev=11974.67 lat (usec): min=83, max=237985, avg=28578.69, stdev=12253.82 clat percentiles (usec): | 1.00th=[ 1608], 5.00th=[16768], 10.00th=[17792], 20.00th=[19328], | 30.00th=[20352], 40.00th=[21376], 50.00th=[22400], 60.00th=[25984], | 70.00th=[35072], 80.00th=[37632], 90.00th=[40704], 95.00th=[45824], | 99.00th=[63744], 99.50th=[75264], 99.90th=[94720], 99.95th=[101888], | 99.99th=[125440] bw (KB /s): min= 0, max=12931, per=0.78%, avg=8957.79, stdev=980.34 lat (usec) : 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.05% lat (msec) : 2=1.96%, 4=0.70%, 10=0.01%, 20=24.54%, 50=68.30% lat (msec) : 100=4.39%, 250=0.06% 说明:60%的延迟在50ms cpu : usr=0.39%, sys=2.42%, ctx=6605219, majf=0, minf=8200 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=109.8%, >=64=0.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% issued : total=r=85988683/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: io=671818MB, aggrb=1119.7MB/s, minb=1119.7MB/s, maxb=1119.7MB/s, mint=600015msec, maxt=600015msec Disk stats (read/write): sda: ios=94385676/0, merge=110/0, ticks=207649589/0, in_queue=207374825, util=100.00% 本地盘: [global] direct=1 iodepth=32 ioengine=libaio norandommap randrepeat=0 numjobs=128 runtime=600 ramp_time=60 thread group_reporting name=mytest [randread] filename=/dev/cciss/c0d0p2 bs=8k rw=randread 最终结果: [19083KB/0KB/0KB /s] [2385/0/0 iops] [eta 18h:41m:14s] mytest: (groupid=0, jobs=128): err= 0: pid=18257: Sun Mar 31 06:17:48 2013 read : io=3708.1MB, bw=6300.2KB/s, iops=780, runt=602834msec slat (usec): min=5, max=5489.7K, avg=162593.81, stdev=906297.12 clat (usec): min=29, max=10575K, avg=5068121.79, stdev=1001568.61 lat (usec): min=40, max=15858K, avg=5231354.46, stdev=1336481.76 clat percentiles (msec): | 1.00th=[ 29], 5.00th=[ 5145], 10.00th=[ 5145], 20.00th=[ 5211], | 30.00th=[ 5211], 40.00th=[ 5276], 50.00th=[ 5276], 60.00th=[ 5276], | 70.00th=[ 5342], 80.00th=[ 5342], 90.00th=[ 5342], 95.00th=[ 5407], | 99.00th=[ 5473], 99.50th=[ 5473], 99.90th=[ 5538], 99.95th=[ 5538], | 99.99th=[ 5538] bw (KB /s): min= 0, max= 1158, per=0.78%, avg=48.88, stdev=19.10 lat (usec) : 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=0.02%, 500=0.04%, 750=0.01% lat (usec) : 1000=0.01% lat (msec) : 4=0.01%, 10=0.09%, 20=0.43%, 50=1.32%, 100=1.31% lat (msec) : 250=0.22%, 500=0.05%, 750=0.07%, 1000=0.07%, 2000=0.16% lat (msec) : >=2000=97.03% 说明:97.03%的延迟在2000ms以上 cpu : usr=0.00%, sys=0.01%, ctx=35292, majf=0, minf=8198 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.2%, 16=0.4%, 32=109.1%, >=64=0.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% issued : total=r=470774/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0 Run status group 0 (all jobs): READ: io=3708.1MB, aggrb=6300KB/s, minb=6300KB/s, maxb=6300KB/s, mint=602834msec, maxt=602834msec Disk stats (read/write): cciss!c0d0: ios=517653/321, merge=0/717, ticks=96165858/457, in_queue=96178286, util=99.94% LSI、本地磁盘结果比较: LSI的IOPS为:144k,本地硬盘IOPS为2385,LSI存储卡速度明显高于本地磁盘。而且,LSI延迟较低,大部分延迟在50ms,而本地磁盘97%的延迟在2000ms。 (责任编辑:IT) |