当前位置: > Linux教程 > 系统运维 >

普通磁盘与LSI闪存卡测试对比

时间:2014-12-26 20:02来源:itpub.net 作者:张正

Sysbench测试:
测试环境:
工具:sysbench 0.4.12
Mysql 5.6.15
Innodb buffer pool:2G
本次测试,数据量:11.7G
注:以下所提及到的本地硬盘,为raid存储划分到本地的空间。
 
准备数据:
sysbench --debug=off --test=oltp --mysql-table-engine=innodb  --oltp-table-size=50000000 --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=mysql --mysql-socket=/lsi/mysql/mysql.sock prepare
说明:模拟OLTP操作,数据量5000万行,每行记录252Byte。
 
 
LSI
sysbench --num-threads=256 --test=oltp --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=mysql --mysql-table-engine=innodb  --init-rng=on --oltp-table-size=50000000 --max-time=$RT --max-requests=1000000 --mysql-socket=/lsi/mysql/mysql.sock run > sysbench.log
说明:并发256,存储引擎innodb
 
执行过程中,CPU与LSI卡的情况:

说明:并发较大,CPU较繁忙,但是IO不是太busy,说明瓶颈不在IO上。
最终结果:
Initializing random number generator from timer.
 
 
Doing OLTP test.
Running mixed OLTP test
Using Special distribution (12 iterations,  1 pct of values are returned in 75 pct cases)
Using "BEGIN" for starting transactions
Using auto_inc on the id column
Maximum number of requests for OLTP test is limited to 1000000
Threads started!
Done.
 
OLTP test statistics:
    queries performed:
        read:                            14014098
        write:                           5005024
        other:                           2002010
        total:                           21021132
    transactions:                        1001003 (3445.66 per sec.)
    deadlocks:                           4      (0.01 per sec.)
    read/write requests:                 19019122 (65467.84 per sec.)
    other operations:                    2002010 (6891.34 per sec.)
 
Test execution summary:
    total time:                          290.5109s
    total number of events:              1001003
    total time taken by event execution: 74348.2259
    per-request statistics:
         min:                                  3.41ms
         avg:                                 74.27ms
         max:                                756.14ms
         approx.  95 percentile:             144.95ms
 
Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           3910.1680/32.56
    execution time (avg/stddev):   290.4228/0.01

本地盘:
sysbench --num-threads=256 --test=oltp --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=mysql --mysql-table-engine=innodb  --init-rng=on --oltp-table-size=50000000 --max-time=$RT --max-requests=1000000 --mysql-socket=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock run > sysbench.log
 
执行过程中磁盘与CPU情况:

说明:与LSI存储卡相比,本地磁盘进行OLTP模拟测试时,CPU相对空闲,IO成为瓶颈。
最终结果:
Initializing random number generator from timer.
 
Doing OLTP test.
Running mixed OLTP test
Using Special distribution (12 iterations,  1 pct of values are returned in 75 pct cases)
Using "BEGIN" for starting transactions
Using auto_inc on the id column
Maximum number of requests for OLTP test is limited to 1000000
Threads started!
Done.
 
OLTP test statistics:
    queries performed:
        read:                            14013118
        write:                           5004682
        other:                           2001873
        total:                           21019673
    transactions:                        1000936 (959.86 per sec.)
    deadlocks:                           1      (0.00 per sec.)
    read/write requests:                 19017800 (18237.34 per sec.)
    other operations:                    2001873 (1919.72 per sec.)
 
Test execution summary:
    total time:                          1042.7948s
    total number of events:              1000936
    total time taken by event execution: 266923.0217
    per-request statistics:
         min:                                  3.46ms
         avg:                                266.67ms
         max:                               6884.36ms
         approx.  95 percentile:             649.23ms
 
Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           3909.9062/30.04
execution time (avg/stddev):   1042.6681/0.03


结论:使用LSI闪存卡后,MySQL的TPS提升了260%其实本测试中的磁盘也是相当高端的存储,一般磁盘达不到这个数(具体配置我记不清了,可通过下面的IOPS可以看出来)


FIO测试:
进行8K的随机读,测试时间为10分钟
LSI
fio tmp.txt
tmp.txt
[global]
direct=1
iodepth=32
ioengine=libaio
norandommap
randrepeat=0
numjobs=128
runtime=600
ramp_time=60
thread
group_reporting
name=mytest
[randread]
filename=/dev/sda1
bs=8k
rw=randread


说明:FIO测试是直接对存储设备进行读写
最终结果:
 [1123MB/0KB/0KB /s] [144K/0/0 iops] [eta 00m:00s]
mytest: (groupid=0, jobs=128): err= 0: pid=9514: Fri Jan 17 15:30:26 2014
  read : io=671818MB, bw=1119.7MB/s, iops=143310, runt=600015msec
    slat (usec): min=3, max=136762, avg=871.03, stdev=4018.21
    clat (usec): min=77, max=237967, avg=27708.34, stdev=11974.67
     lat (usec): min=83, max=237985, avg=28578.69, stdev=12253.82
    clat percentiles (usec):
     |  1.00th=[ 1608],  5.00th=[16768], 10.00th=[17792], 20.00th=[19328],
     | 30.00th=[20352], 40.00th=[21376], 50.00th=[22400], 60.00th=[25984],
     | 70.00th=[35072], 80.00th=[37632], 90.00th=[40704], 95.00th=[45824],
     | 99.00th=[63744], 99.50th=[75264], 99.90th=[94720], 99.95th=[101888],
     | 99.99th=[125440]
    bw (KB  /s): min=    0, max=12931, per=0.78%, avg=8957.79, stdev=980.34
    lat (usec) : 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%, 1000=0.05%
    lat (msec) : 2=1.96%, 4=0.70%, 10=0.01%, 20=24.54%, 50=68.30%
    lat (msec) : 100=4.39%, 250=0.06%
  说明:60%的延迟在50ms
cpu          : usr=0.39%, sys=2.42%, ctx=6605219, majf=0, minf=8200
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=109.8%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=85988683/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
 
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: io=671818MB, aggrb=1119.7MB/s, minb=1119.7MB/s, maxb=1119.7MB/s, mint=600015msec, maxt=600015msec
 
Disk stats (read/write):
  sda: ios=94385676/0, merge=110/0, ticks=207649589/0, in_queue=207374825, util=100.00%
 
本地盘:
[global]
direct=1
iodepth=32
ioengine=libaio
norandommap
randrepeat=0
numjobs=128
runtime=600
ramp_time=60
thread
group_reporting
name=mytest
[randread]
filename=/dev/cciss/c0d0p2
bs=8k
rw=randread

最终结果:
[19083KB/0KB/0KB /s] [2385/0/0 iops] [eta 18h:41m:14s]
mytest: (groupid=0, jobs=128): err= 0: pid=18257: Sun Mar 31 06:17:48 2013
  read : io=3708.1MB, bw=6300.2KB/s, iops=780, runt=602834msec
    slat (usec): min=5, max=5489.7K, avg=162593.81, stdev=906297.12
    clat (usec): min=29, max=10575K, avg=5068121.79, stdev=1001568.61
     lat (usec): min=40, max=15858K, avg=5231354.46, stdev=1336481.76
    clat percentiles (msec):
     |  1.00th=[   29],  5.00th=[ 5145], 10.00th=[ 5145], 20.00th=[ 5211],
     | 30.00th=[ 5211], 40.00th=[ 5276], 50.00th=[ 5276], 60.00th=[ 5276],
     | 70.00th=[ 5342], 80.00th=[ 5342], 90.00th=[ 5342], 95.00th=[ 5407],
     | 99.00th=[ 5473], 99.50th=[ 5473], 99.90th=[ 5538], 99.95th=[ 5538],
     | 99.99th=[ 5538]
    bw (KB  /s): min=    0, max= 1158, per=0.78%, avg=48.88, stdev=19.10
    lat (usec) : 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=0.02%, 500=0.04%, 750=0.01%
    lat (usec) : 1000=0.01%
    lat (msec) : 4=0.01%, 10=0.09%, 20=0.43%, 50=1.32%, 100=1.31%
    lat (msec) : 250=0.22%, 500=0.05%, 750=0.07%, 1000=0.07%, 2000=0.16%
    lat (msec) : >=2000=97.03%
  说明:97.03%的延迟在2000ms以上
cpu          : usr=0.00%, sys=0.01%, ctx=35292, majf=0, minf=8198
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.2%, 16=0.4%, 32=109.1%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=470774/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
 
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: io=3708.1MB, aggrb=6300KB/s, minb=6300KB/s, maxb=6300KB/s, mint=602834msec, maxt=602834msec
 
Disk stats (read/write):
  cciss!c0d0: ios=517653/321, merge=0/717, ticks=96165858/457, in_queue=96178286, util=99.94%
 
LSI、本地磁盘结果比较:
LSI的IOPS为:144k,本地硬盘IOPS为2385,LSI存储卡速度明显高于本地磁盘。而且,LSI延迟较低,大部分延迟在50ms,而本地磁盘97%的延迟在2000ms。
 



(责任编辑:IT)
------分隔线----------------------------
栏目列表
推荐内容